Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 738 So. 2d 640 - State v. Williams

738 So. 2d 640 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Ibarra v. Thaler (2012), 803 So. 2d 131 - State v. Gordon (2001)

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

270199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Faretta v. California · State v. Oliveaux · Lombard v. Marcera

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Given this limited purpose, the Jackson standard does not serve as a vehicle for a reviewing court to second guess the rational credibility determinations of the factfinder at trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A. Oral sexual battery is the intentional engaging in any of the following acts with another person, who is not the spouse of the offender, when the offender either compels the other person to submit by placing the person in fear of receiving bodily harm, or when the other person has not yet attained fifteen years of age and is at least three years younger than the offender: (1) The touching of the anus or genitals of the victim by the offender using the mouth or tongue of the offender;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “automatically be considered deficient performance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.