Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 738 So. 2d 721 - State v. Holland

738 So. 2d 721 - State v. Holland’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rosenbloom v. Rosenbloom · McHale v. McHale · 694 So. 2d 290 - Barrios v. Barrios · Rosenbloom v. Bauchat · Hector v. Raymond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court may also consider as income the benefits a party derives from expense-sharing or other sources; however, in determining the benefits of expense-sharing, the court shall not consider the income of another spouse, regardless of the legal regime under which the remarriage exists, except to the extent that such income is used directly to reduce the cost of a party's actual expenses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.