Rector v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2003
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Enmund v. Florida · Moore v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The heart of the holding in Brady is the prosecution’s suppression of evidence, in the face of a defense production request, where the evidence is favorable to the accused and is material either to guilt or to punishment. Important, then, are (a) suppression by the prosecution after a request by the defense, (b) the evidence’s favorable character for the defense, and (c) the materiality of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Richardson v. State“That is, the State may not rely on evidence that another with whom the defendant was acting acted deliberately and with a reasonable expectation that death would result_ The jury must determine whether appellant’s own culpable conduct which contributed to the deceased’s death was committed deliberately and with the reasonable expectation that death would result, [citations omitted] (emphasis supplied).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Belyeu v. State“Did you see two other black dudes around here?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rector v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.