Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 738 SW2D 274 - Polk v. State

Polk v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably State v. Roberts (1996), Garcia v. State (1992)

27 state decisions

1501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Mapp v. Ohio · Weeks v. United States · Alderman v. United States · Goldstein v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) No evidence obtained by an officer or other person in violation of any provisions of the Constitution or laws of the State of Texas, or of the Constitution or laws of the United States of America, shall be admitted in evidence against the accused on the trial of any criminal case ... (b) It is an exception to the provisions of Subsection (a) of this Article that the evidence was obtained by a law enforcement officer acting in objective good faith reliance upon a warrant issued by a neutral magistrate based on probable cause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[violation of a State statute or constitutional provision in obtaining evidence requires suppression of that evidence under Art. 38.23 ...; a judge has no discretion in ruling on the exclusion of that evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.