Jeter v. Keohane’s Empirical Analysis
739 F.2d 257 · 1984
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Matta-Ballesteros v. Henman (1990), United States Simmons v. Gramley (1990)
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Ponzi v. Fessenden · Richardson v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · Causey v. Civiletti · United States v. Warren · United States v. Croft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] person who has violated the criminal statutes of both the Federal and State Governments may not complain of the order in which he is tried or punished for such offenses.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an evidentiary hearing is not necessary when the facts essential to consideration of the constitutional issue are already before the court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to the state and the marshal never surrendered custody, the sheriff had no authority to deliver the petitioner to state prison as required by the mittimus. Thus, the failure to do so did not violate the petitioner's due process rights. Accordingly, the district court's dismissal of Klein's action is 13 AFFIRMED. * After preliminary examination of the briefs, the court notified the parties that it had tentatively concluded that oral argument would not be helpful to the court in this case. The notice provided that any party might file a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Klein v. Kindt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.