United States v. Holecek’s Empirical Analysis
739 F.2d 331 · 1984
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2015
16 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 61 (Payment-in-Kind Tax Treatment Act of 1983) · 26 U.S.C. § 7205 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on Brandenburg v. Ohio · Angrist v. United States · Rauch v. United States · Cotton v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia · United States v. Catlett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.