Falk v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
739 F.2d 461 · 1984
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Meadows v. Dominican Republic (1987), Alan Neuman Productions, Inc. v. Albright (1988)
43 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Waldschmidt v. Ranier · United Coin Meter Company Inc v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad · Feliciano v. Reliant Tooling Co. · Inryco, Inc. v. Metropolitan Engineering Co. · Gross v. Stereo Component Systems, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the plaintiff will be prejudiced, (2) whether the defendant has a meritorious defense, and (3) whether culpable conduct of the defendant led to the default.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whenever possible, be decided on the merits.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.