United States v. Kaye’s Empirical Analysis
739 F.2d 488 · 1984
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably United States v. Burt (1985), United States v. Daddino (1993)
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. DiFrancesco · Pollard v. United States · Bozza v. United States · Stevens v. Marks · Simopoulos v. Virginia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]lerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of the record and errors in the record arising from oversight or omission....”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“conform the sentence to the term which the record indicates was intended.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the error or omission is indeed a judicial error, rather than a clerical mistake, it is not within the purview of [Rule 36]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.