Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 739 F.2d 878 - Nash v. Jeffes

Nash v. Jeffes’s Empirical Analysis

739 F.2d 878 · 1984

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2012 · most notably New Jersey Department of Corrections v. Nash (1985), Carchman v. Nash New Jersey Department of Corrections (1985)

15 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

2201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1406

Relies on Cuyler v. Adams · Cooper v. Lockhart · Hopper v. United States Parole Commission · Pittman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “courts have generally required that prisoners must strictly comply with IAD procedures before they will dismiss charges on the basis of a violation of [the 180-day provision of] Article III.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is necessary because the prosecuting authorities cannot be expected to analyze each communication from a prisoner with a fine-tooth comb to determine whether it should be construed as invoking the IAD.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “On the basis of that letter, Nash was justified in taking no further action when, two weeks later, the Pennsylvania authorities provided him with a 'detainer procedure notice.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.