Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 739 F.2d 90 - Irish National Insurance Company Limited v. Aer Lingus Teoranta

Irish National Insurance Company Limited v. Aer Lingus Teoranta’s Empirical Analysis

739 F.2d 90 · 1984

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2008 · most notably Trivelloni-Lorenzi v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. (1987), Picketts v. International Playtex, Inc. (1990)

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

160198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n · Stevens v. Marks · Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products Inc · Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc. v. M/V Nordic Regent

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “national treatment with respect to ... having access to the courts of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although the Supreme Court has emphasized the broad discretion of the district courts in deciding whether to dismiss on the basis of forum non conveniens, there would be little purpose in Congress giving this Court a power of review if it were not a meaningful one. A meaningful power of review is the right to determine whether the district court reached an erroneous conclusion on either the facts or the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A meaningful power of review is the right to determine whether the district court reached an erroneous conclusion on either the facts or the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.