United States v. St. Junius’s Empirical Analysis
739 F.3d 193 · 2013
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Northern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128b of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Stinson v. United States · Hughey v. United States · Alleyne v. United States · United States v. Beechum · United States v. Delgado
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exercised management responsibility over the property, assets, or activities of a criminal organization.” U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, cmt. n.2. 3 . Defendant did not cover the asset management issue in his initial brief or file a reply brief responding to the government’s arguments on this point. In its brief, the government cited Delgado regarding the standard of review on appeal, but did not discuss its interpretation of § 3B1.1. The government did, however, argue that an adjustment may still be applied where a defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(c), hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at trial or a hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted ... The rule against hearsay does not apply when an out-of-court statement is offered for some purpose other than to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“). Because the instruction was not supported by evidence showing Araiza-Jacobo engaged in any purposeful contrivance to avoid learning of the illegal conduct, the district court erred. B. Even when an erroneous deliberate ignorance instruction is given, the error”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.