Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 739 F.3d 342 - Coleman v. Lemke

Coleman v. Lemke’s Empirical Analysis

739 F.3d 342 · 2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · Schlup v. Delo · William O'sullivan v. Darren Boerckel · United States v. Abel · House v. Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Against the state's six witnesses and corroborating surveillance video, the affidavits of these four witnesses simply do not warrant the application of the miscarriage of justice exception or an evidentiary hearing. [Citations.] After reviewing the evidence, old and new, of Brown's guilt, this Court cannot conclude that 'no juror, acting reasonably, would have voted to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.