Eller v. Trans Union, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
739 F.3d 467 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681A · 15 U.S.C. § 1681E · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on General Electric Co. v. Joiner · Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp. · Cartier v. Jackson · Octavia Beltran-Tirado v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Amoco Production Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]henever a [CRA] prepares a consumer report, it shall follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]o prevail on [her] § 1681e(b) claims, [she has] to prove not only that [a CRA] failed to follow reasonable procedures ... but also that it produced inaccurate 'credit reports'-[a term of art] defined in the FCRA ... as a communication of credit information to a third party-that were the proximate cause of [her] injuries.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A party impliedly consents to ’the trial of an issue not contained within the pleadings either by introducing evidence on the new issue or by failing to object when the opposing party introduces such evidence.” Eller v. Trans Union, LLC, 739 F.3d 467, 479 (10th Cir.2013) (quotations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.