Kittay v. Korff’s Empirical Analysis
739 F.3d 99 · 2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 544 · 11 U.S.C. § 546 · 11 U.S.C. § 548 · 11 U.S.C. § 550 · 11 U.S.C. § 701 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on In Re: Sharp International Corp · United States v. O'Neil · Frank Sabolsky v. Michael Budzanoski Appeal of Louis A. Antal · Endico Potatoes, Inc. v. CIT Group/Factoring, Inc. · Elmore v. Henderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The question of whether prejudgment interest should be awarded in an avoidance and recovery action brought under federal bankruptcy law is an open one in our Court. Many of the courts in this Circuit look to the source of the law underlying plaintiffs claims: claims that arise out of federal law are governed by federal rules, claims arising out of state law are governed by state rules .... We agree this is the proper framework for the analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.