Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 739 NE2D 135 - Zavala v. State

Zavala v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Mapp v. Ohio · Elkins v. United States · United States v. Morrison · Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fundamental error doctrine is inapplicable ... because no violation of a fundamental right is implicated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.