Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 739 N.W.2d 289 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Heemstra · State v. Nitcher · State v. Thomas · State v. Bower · State v. Satern

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Defendant must be acting in concert with another. 2. Defendant must knowingly be participating in a public offense. 3. A “different crime” must be committed by another participant in furtherance of the defendant’s offense. 4. The commission of the different crime must be reasonably foreseen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.