In Re Nash’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Hill · Fisher v. Iowa Board of Optometry Examiners · Matter of Peterson · In Re King · In Re Hanus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I find no evidence that Mr. Nash suffers from any diagnosable psychiatric disorder of any sort. Further, I find no evidence that Mr. Nash presents a risk of perpetrating abuse of any type upon any individual, minor or adult. Finally, I find no evidence that Mr. Nash possesses any mental disorder or personality traits which would, in any way, impair his ability to maintain the moral character and honesty expected of an Iowa Lawyer.[ [6] ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Nash“We have a duty to the citizens of Iowa to ensure the practice of law is reserved for individuals who will respect the trust inherent in the lawyer-client relationship. We conclude Michael Nash has established by a convincing preponderance of the evidence he possesses the requisite moral character and fitness for admission to the Iowa bar. We therefore grant his application to take the Iowa bar examination.[ [10] ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Nash“crossed appropriate pastoral boundaries,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Nash
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.