Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 739 P2D 1214 - Ramirez v. State

Ramirez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Hodges v. State (1995), Zabel v. State (1988)

24 state decisions

1101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Babich v. United States · National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho · Gibson v. United States · Martinez v. State · United States v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 106. Remainder of or related writings or recorded statements. When a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced by a party, an adverse party may require him at that time to introduce any other part or any other writing or recorded statement which ought in fairness to be considered contemporaneously with it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Assuming a defense of voluntary abandonment, does there come a point at which it is too late for the defendant to withdraw? Obviously there must be, for it would hardly do to excuse the defendant from attempted murder after he had wounded the victim or, indeed, after he had fired and missed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to -prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.