Halladay v. Cluff’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2016
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 15 Utah 2d 156 - Fuoco v. Williams · Mann v. Oppenheimer & Co. · 19 Ark. App. 259 - Broadhead v. McEntire · Halladay v. Cluff · Hein Enterprises, Ltd. v. San Francisco Real Estate Investors
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[it is for th{at] reason that where, as in this case, all possible ramifications of a decision on appeal may not be readily apparent, a case will be remanded for such proceedings as are appropriate in view of the guidance offered in the opinion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Cross-appeals are properly limited to grievances a party has with the judgment as it was entered-not grievances it might acquire depending on the outcome of the appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the absence of the cross-appeal did not, of itself, foreclose the trial court from reassessing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.