¶1concurring in the result.
¶2I do not believe that Nettles v. Nettles, 47 Ala.App. 448, 256 So.2d 189 (Civ.1971), and Hackmeyer v. Hackmeyer, 268 Ala. 329, 106 So.2d 245 (1958), support the proposition that a court may make a property award in an annulment proceeding. I concur in the result only because the trial court basically left the parties where it found them; the court “awarded” each party his or her own separate property and ordered each party to assume his or her own separate liabilities.
¶3THOMPSON, J., concurs.