Mundell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 436 So. 2d 30 - Achin v. State · 712 So. 2d 384 - Merritt v. State · 675 So. 2d 989 - Fredericks v. State · 714 So. 2d 1198 - Mills v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although Mr. Mundell never objected to his conviction for this offense and even requested a jury instruction on this nonexistent offense, the error can be raised for the first time on appeal because the crime of which he was convicted does not exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Conviction of a non-existent crime is fundamental error mandating reversal even when the error was invited by the defendant....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.