Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

739 So. 2d 1269

Spacco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 27, 1999

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-08-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-08-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAUKSCH, J.,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I respectfully dissent.

¶3In my opinion this appellant received what he bargained for, a light sentence for pleading guilty. He cries about having to be on probation after his prison time and says no one told him he may have to serve that duty upon release. What this habitual criminal, who is well acquainted with the justice system, got was an agreement in court not to give him the heavy sentence he was due upon habitualization. For him to seek another break now is not out of character but certainly not deserving of countenance.

/739/so2d/1269 · .json · Public domain