Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

739 So. 2d 148

Turner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-07-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2015

1 state decisions

Relies on Williamson v. Williamson · Prince v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-07-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

■PER CURIAM.

¶1The order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. As to the issue of credit for time served in Alabama awaiting extradition, the motion is successive. See Prince v. State, 719 So.2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). As to the second issue, credit for time served in Florida, the order denying relief is affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a properly pled 3.800(a) motion. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

¶2AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, MINER AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
/739/so2d/148 · .json · Public domain