Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 739 SO2D 3 - Ex Parte Walker

Ex Parte Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Livingston v. Livingston · Ratliff v. Ratliff · Hames v. Irwin · Markstein v. Schilleci · Williams v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[i]t is only after actual knowledge of the fact that the possession is hostile and intended to oust the co-tenant and defeat his common interest that the rule of repose begins to run against the co-tenant.' " Ex parte Walker , 739 So.2d at 7 (quoting Knouff , 485 So.2d at 1156 ). It is evident that the "rule of repose”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.