739 So. 2d 312 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · California v. Green · Idaho v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Supreme Court has never allowed the admission against a defendant of a codefendants hearsay inculpatory statements to law enforcement authorities, although it has suggested that theoretically such hearsay could be admitted in appropriate circumstances.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jackson · State v. Delaney“where, in a joint trial, the codefendant's confession that potentially incriminates defendant is introduced as evidence solely”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Delaney“the codefendant even where the defendant's own confession, which”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Delaney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.