Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 739 SO2D 402 - Mitchell v. State

Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 665 So. 2d 852 - Eakes v. State · 692 So. 2d 755 - Lester v. State · Blumenberg v. State · Parchman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is fundamental that courts may amend indictments only to correct defects of form, however, defects of substance must be corrected by the grand jury.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"It is fundamental that courts may amend indictments only to correct defects of form, however, defects of substance must be corrected by the grand jury." "[A] change in the indictment is permissible if it does not materially alter facts which are the essence of the offense... as it originally stood or materially alter a defense to the indictment as it originally stood so as to prejudice the defendant's case." "The test ... is whether the defense as it originally stood would be equally available after the amendment is made."”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The test ... is whether the defense as it originally stood would be equally available after the amendment is made.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.