Chaney v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 575 So. 2d 16 - MacKbee v. State · Commonwealth v. Brown · 333 Pa. Super. 155 - Commonwealth v. Smith · 567 So. 2d 1189 - Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the victim is aware that someone is attempting to take property from their person and does not indicate any consent to the taking, the crime of pickpocketing or larceny is elevated to robbery because violence or the threat of violence, even though slight, was a factor in the taking.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.