Quinn v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 669 So. 2d 14 - Bevill v. State · 421 So. 2d 476 - Phillips v. State · 612 So. 2d 342 - Culberson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is still incumbent on a trial judge to ascertain that the defendant knew the possible penalties which might be imposed for the charged offense to which the plea was made and there is no contention that this was not done. Therefore, a plea’s possible enhancing effect on a subsequent sentence is merely a collateral consequence of the conviction; it is not the type of consequence about which a defendant must be advised before the defendant enters the plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Magyar v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.