Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 739 So. 2d 425 - Finley v. State

739 So. 2d 425 - Finley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2017

9 state decisions

50199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 687 So. 2d 1124 - Foster v. State · 577 So. 2d 390 - Anderson v. State · Roland v. State · 708 So. 2d 73 - Ford v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must specifically allege facts showing that effective assistance of counsel was not in fact rendered, and he must allege with specificity the fact that but for such purported actions by ineffective counsel, the results of the trial court decision would have been different.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To merit an evidentiary hearing on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant's allegations of counsel's performance must raise `sufficient questions of fact on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is judged by the standard in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The two inquiries under the Strickland standard are (1) whether counsel's performance was deficient, and, if so, (2) whether the deficient performance was prejudicial to the defendant in the sense that our confidence in the correctness of the outcome is undermined.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.