739 So. 2d 568 - Ramirez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 182 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 183 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably 803 So. 2d 598 - Connor v. State (2001), 209 Ill. 2d 492 - People v. Braggs (2004)
1 federal appellate · 182 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Bruton v. United States · Colorado v. Connelly · Malloy v. Hogan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 183 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the manner in which police summon the suspect for questioning; (2) the purpose, place, and manner of the interrogation; (3) the extent to which the suspect is confronted with evidence of his or her guilt; (4) whether the suspect is informed that he or she is free to leave the place of questioning.”
31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mansfield v. State · Evans v. State“a reasonable person placed in the same position would believe that his or her freedom of action was curtailed to a degree associated with actual arrest.”
22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Thompson · Cillo v. State“First, the relinquishment of the right must have been voluntary in the sense that it was the product of free and deliberate choice rather than intimidation, coercion, or deception. Second, the waiver must have been made with a full awareness of both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it. Only if the "totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation" reveal both an uncoerced choice and the requisite level of comprehension may a court properly conclude that the Miranda rights have been waived.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Parker v. State · J.G. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.