739 So. 2d 762 - Stogner v. Stogner’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
107 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 874 So. 2d 131 - Richard v. Hall (2004), Fink v. Bryant (2001)
107 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 339 So. 2d 835 - Ducote v. Ducote · 549 So. 2d 267 - Hogan v. Hogan · State v. Piazza · 559 So. 2d 124 - Frazier v. Conagra, Inc. · 728 So. 2d 14 - State v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An award for support shall not be reduced or increased unless the party seeking the reduction or increase shows a change in circumstances of one of the parties between the time of the previous award and the time of the motion for modification of the award.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“it must be interpreted as having the meaning that best conforms to the purpose of the law.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“`consider the guidelines ... to review the adequacy of the stipulated amount.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.