739 So. 2d 98
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 11, 1998
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-09-11
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2000
1 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“Should the holding in State v. Gurican, 576 So.2d 709 (Fla.1991), be re-evaluated in light of Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States, 507 U.S. 234 , 113 S.Ct. 1199 , 122 L.Ed.2d 581 (1993)?”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 759 So. 2d 678 - Taylor v. State
Relies on Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States · 576 So. 2d 709 - State v. Gurican · 703 So. 2d 522 - Griffis v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1998-09-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
¶2We grant appellant’s motion for certification, and certify to the supreme court the same question we certified in Griffis v. State, 703 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), review granted, Case No. 92,160, — So.2d - (Fla.1998):
SHOULD THE HOLDING IN STATE v. GURICAN, 576 So.2d 709 (Fla.1991), BE RE-EVALUATED IN LIGHT OF ORTEGA-RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES, 507 U.S. 234, 113 S.Ct. 1199, 122 L.Ed.2d 581 (1993)?