Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 739 SW2D 347 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Muniz v. State (1993), McCoy v. State (1996)

28 state decisions

1201987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Benson v. State · Boozer v. State · Barefoot v. State · Brown v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is bodily injury that creates a substantial risk of death or causes death, serious permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n order for the prosecution to establish that the bodily injury was in fact a serious bodily injury, it is incumbent upon the prosecution not only to present evidence that the victim sustained a bodily injury, it is also incumbent upon the prosecution to establish by competent and relevant evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the injury was life threatening; i.e., that it was so grave or serious that it must be regarded as differing in kind, and not merely in degree, from other bodily harm.... In other words, the prosecution must present relevant and probative evidence from which a rational trier of fact could infer beyond a reasonable doubt that the bodily injury the victim sustained created a substantial risk of death from the injury itself, and not from some hypothetical or mere possibility that the bodily injury created a substantial risk of death.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Now if you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that ... the defendant, Roland Jerome Madden, did intentionally or knowingly shoot Antrum Donell with a firearm and thereby cause serious bodily injury to Antrum Donell, as alleged in the indictment, or if you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that ... the defendant, Roland Jerome Madden, did then and there intentionally or knowingly shoot Antrum Donell with a firearm and thereby cause bodily injury to Antrum Do-nell, as alleged in the indictment, then you will find the defendant guilty as charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.