Strong v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “situation, where different lawyers represent clients who have some interests in common ... The rule does not apply to situations where there is no common interest to be promoted by a joint consultation, and the parties meet on a purely adversary basis. [Emphasis added] Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Rule 503(b)(3), 51 F.R.D. 315 , 361-362 (1971). The Committee Note fails to differentiate between a”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Strong v. State

2. “The third type of communication occurs in the "joint defense" or "pooled information" situation, where different lawyers represent clients who have some interests in common ... The rule does not apply to situations where there is no common interest to be promoted by a joint consultation, and the parties meet on a purely adversary basis. [Emphasis added]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Strong v. State