Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Harris v. State (1992), Martinez v. State (1998)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roberts v. Louisiana · Timberlake v. United States · Todd v. State · Meshell v. State · Porter v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Such compliance constitutes ‘a prima facie showing of a knowing and voluntary plea of guilty. The burden then shifts to the defendant to show that he entered the plea without understanding the consequences of his action and was thus harmed.’ Ex parte Gibauitch, 688 S.W.2d 868, 871 (Tex.Cr.App.1985). See also Whitten v. State, 587 S.W.2d 156 (Tex.Cr.App.1979).” Robinson, 739 S.W. 2d at 801 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Eatmon v. State“[1]t is settled that, as a matter of Texas criminal law, the term “stipulation,” at least as used in Art. 1.15 ... includes inter alia agreements as to what particular evidence or testimony would be, if presented in full in open court, without conceding the truthfulness of that evidence or otherwise waiving the need for proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Stone v. State“the actor voluntarily releases the victim alive and in a safe place[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.