Long v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1992
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sheppard v. Maxwell · Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg · Albrecht v. State · Houston v. State · Williams v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court below acted within its discretion in finding the transaction in question relevant to Appellant's state of mind on the evening in question; that is, that his purpose in going to the club was to leave with a woman_ Moreover, the probative value of the evidence is not outweighed by any inflammatory or prejudicial potential.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Long v. State“The record fails to show that the State’s actions, whether denominated purposeful or careless, were undertaken with an intent to harm Appellant. In fact, State’s counsel admitted any test results could have been 100% in Appellant’s favor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Long v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.