¶1We do not think the receiver was justified in appointing an agent to collect the rents under the facts disclosed in this case. The objection to the account allowing the receiver the amount paid to the agent for collecting the rents in question, namely, forty dollars and fifty-two cents, should, therefore, have been sustained. The order appealed from is, therefore, modified by sustaining the exception so far as this sum of forty dollars and fifty-two cents is* concerned, and charging the receiver with that amount, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present—Van Brunt, P. J.,. O’Brien, Ingraham, McLaughlin and Hatch, JJ.
74 A.D. 626
Kelly v. Moore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 1902
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1902-07-15
Respondent.—Order modified by sustaining exceptions, so far as the sum of forty dollars and fifty-two cents is concerned, and charging the receiver with that amount, and as so modified affirmed, without- costs.—Appeal from an order denying in part plaintiff’s motion for an order sustaining exceptions, etc.
Decided 1902-07-15