Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 A.D.2d 917

Kiley v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1980-03-31

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2020

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-03-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In a claim to recover property damages for trespass and negligence predicated on defendant’s failure to properly maintain its salt stockpiles, with the alleged result that the claimant’s well water became contaminated, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims, entered August 27, 1979, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the claimant. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The preponderance of evidence, particularly the testimony of the claimant’s two experts, supports the inference that the salt pollution which contaminated the claimant’s well was caused by the failure of the State to properly maintain its salt stockpiles. (See Meehan v State of New York, 95 Misc 2d 678.) Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

/74/ad2d/917 · .json · Public domain