Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 A.D.2d 952

Narsu v. Polsinelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1980-03-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2008

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-03-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mikoll, J.,

¶1concurs in the following memorandum. Mikoll, J. (concurring). I agree that the stay granted by Special Term must be set aside. The petitioner is now entitled to proceed to sale of the property or, under section *9541138 of the Real Property Tax Law, to have the property withdrawn for one of the reasons set out in subdivision 2 of section 1122 of the Real Property Tax Law. The respondent should have a brief opportunity, not exceeding 30 days, to seek an arrangement with petitioner under subdivision 2 of section 1122 of the Real Property Tax Law for installment payments and the possible withdrawal of the parcel.

/74/ad2d/952 · .json · Public domain