Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 ALA 604 - Noble v. Moses Bros.

Noble v. Moses Bros.’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
April 1938
most recently cited

1 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 1938 · most notably Bolden v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. (1925), Jones v. Henderson (1934)

1 district · 26 state decisions

80188318901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Waring v. Lewis · Moog v. Strang · Duckworth v. Duckworth's Adm'r · Allen, Bethune & Co. v. Maury & Co. · Holt v. Agnew

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not connected with the proceedings by which it was obtained, is deemed insufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “must be fraud in the rendition or procurement of the judgment itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.