State v. Chee’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 1981
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Weiler v. United States · Hammer v. United States · 119 Cal. App. 82 - People v. Beesly · People v. Curtis · State v. Shroyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ § 24. Rights of accused in criminal prosecutions “Section 24. In criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right * * to' demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him, to have a copy thereof, * * * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Palmer v. State · Smith v. State““It is, of course, clear that ‘false swearing’ and ‘perjury’ are separate things. All ‘false swearing’ is not perjury. In Arizona, as in all other jurisdictions, the quality of materiality of the perjurious testimony to the issue in which it is given is necessary to raise the ‘false swearing’ to the degree of perjury. The lesser offense is one unknown to the laws of this state as an indictable offense.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ * * * The rules of criminal procedure are not fragmentary or makeshift. They purport to put into effect a new system, and a complete one so far as any system can be said to be complete in whose nature growth is inherent. * * * ” State v. Chee, 74 Ariz. 402, 409 , 250 P.2d 985, 989 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.