Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 ARK 286 - Decker v. Laws

Decker v. Laws’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2003

14 state decisions

6019051910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vaughan v. State · Klein v. German National Bank · Lavender v. Hudgens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““You are instructed that, where the parties give a receipt or check bearing upon its face that the sum mentioned is ‘in full’ payment of the account between the1 parties, the burden is upon such party signing such receipt or cheek to show that it was not intended as a full payment.” '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.