Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 ARK 585 - Fletcher v. Eagle

Fletcher v. Eagle’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
September 1985
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 1985 · most notably St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Rogers (1910), Bank of Commerce v. Goolsby (1917)

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 19 state decisions

80190519101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The circumstances mentioned in the sixth instruction, and they are sustained by the evidence, fully authorized the directors to have implicit confidence in England, and justified their selection of him as president; but no circumstances justify directors in committing the management of the bank to the president, further than the duties of that office require. No matter how honest and capable the president is, the directors have their duties to perform, and cannot fail to perform them because their confidence in the president renders them unnecessary in their opinion. It was their duty as directors to perform the functions required of them bv statute, common usage and the by-laws of the corporation, and any committal of management to the president, which meant a nonfulfillment of their duties as directors, was negligence for which they are liable, provided other facts fixing their liability were present.” See also Patterson v. Stewart, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.