Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 COLO 152 - Larson v. Long

Larson v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
8
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2005

2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

70192319301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oliver v. Weaver · Lebsack v. Moore · Larson v. Long · Cooper v. Woodward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While it is true that such presumption is prima facie only, the court did not say to the jury that it was a conclusive presumption, and the plaintiff should have asked for a modification. As said by this court, in Cooper v. Woodward, 71 Colo. 90 , 204 Pac. 336 : ‘If any points were omitted counsel for defendant should have made the proper requests.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In case of a collision between vehicles, a presumption of negligence arises against the driver who was on the wrong side of the road at the time of the collision.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.