Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 COLO 571 - Haley v. Austin

Haley v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2008

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

90192419301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the parties may, by giving a new note for an old one, thereby extinguish the original debt. Whether or not they do so depends upon various circumstances and their intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.