Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 CONNAPP 248 - State v. Gregory

State v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Berkemer v. McCarty · State v. Golding · Minnesota v. Dickerson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The police are ... not required to confirm every detail of a description of the perpetrator before that person can be detained.... Rather, [w]hat must be taken into account [when determining the existence of a reasonable and articulable suspicion] is the strength of those points of comparison which do match up and whether the nature of the descriptive factors which do not match is such that an error as to them is not improbable ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The nature of the crime under investigation, the degree of suspicion, the location of the stop, the time of day, the reaction of the suspect to the approach of police are all facts which bear on the issue of reasonableness.... Proximity in the time and place of the stop to the crime is highly significant in the determination of whether an investigatory detention is justified by reasonable and articulable suspicion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.