Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 CONNAPP 545 - State v. McColl

State v. McColl’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably State v. Padua (2005), 98 Conn. App. 497 - Ricks v. Commissioner of Correction (2006)

50 state decisions

400200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Blockburger v. United States · Payton v. New York · State v. Golding

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the context of a single trial, the double jeopardy analysis is a two part process. ... First, the charges must arise out of the same act or transaction. Second, it must be determined whether the charged crimes are the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “used or threatened the use of a dangerous instrument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.