Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 F.1d 125 - Gerner v. Thompson

Gerner v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

74 F. 125 · 1896

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1978
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1978

1 federal appellate ·

20189619001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kennedy v. Gibson · Handley v. Stutz · Clark v. Bever · Fogg v. Blair · Hornor v. Henning

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the directors of any national banking association shall knowingly violate or knowingly permit any of the officers, agents or servants of the association to violate any of the provisions of this title, all the rights, privileges and franchises of the association shall be thereby forfeited. Such violation shall, however, be determined and adjudged by a proper Circuit, District or Territorial Court of the United States in a suit brought for that purpose by the Comptroller of the Currency in his own name before the association shall be declared dissolved. And in cases of such violation, every director who participated in or assented to the same shall be held liable in his personal and individual^ capacity for all damages which the association, its shareholders or any other person shall have sustained in consequence of such violation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Boyd v. Schneider

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.