Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 F.3d 1230

Docket No. 95-7209.

Beatty v. Griffin

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: December 14, 1995. Decided: January 17, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-17

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Glenda J. Brim v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2013

2 district ·

20199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David Maurice Beatty, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Beatty v. Griffin, No. CA-95-234-CT-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The district court's typographical error that Plaintiff, rather than Defendant, was employed by the North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services is of no moment

/74/f3d/1230 · .json · Public domain