Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

74 F.3d 1230

Docket No. 95-7587.

Branch v. Murray

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996. Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-24

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Glenda J. Brim v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-24

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jenis Walter Branch, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) habeas petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Branch v. Murray, No. CA-94-77-AM (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/74/f3d/1230 · .json · Public domain